nlpf Eat Umami, Eat Less

[MorrissUnefs]

Jtga How Some COVID-Cautious Experts Are Celebrating Thanksgiving
The climate deniers are at it again. In late December, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank, released what stanley butelka its calling a Climate Fact Check report. The report, which was covered breathlessly by Fox News, purports to expose claims made by climate alarmists and their media all stanley flask ies in 2022 that clashed with reality and science. Spoiler alert: all the claims covered are, in fact, in line with the scientific consensus. Go figure. CEI has a long history of perpetuating climate denial鈥攊ts Director of Global Warming and International Environmental Policy, Myron Ebell, is one of the most high-profile deniers in the U.S.鈥攁nd this report is no exception. The report contains a lot of tried-and-true climate denier tactics to try to discredit coverage of climate-related disasters in 2022 from outlets like the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the BBC. Many of the rhetorical techniques are such old hat that there are entire academic papers and books written them. I wont break down every false claim, scientific misdirect, and pointless non-sequitur in the report, but here are a few highlights: The report says that, because Europe had a megadrought in the 1500s, before coal-fired power plants, SUVs and cheeseburgers, the punishin stanley termos g drought it experienced this year couldnt possibly be juiced up by climate change. The existence of bad droughts in eras past has no bearing on the increased occurrence of these droughts thanks to climate change now. A Ftko Hubble Telescope Observes Surreal Galactic Collision
Chess champion Gary Kasparov contemplating a board in 1997, training for his May rematch with a smarter version of Deep BlueTed Thai鈥擳he LIFE Picture Collection/GettBy Jennifer LatsonFebruary 17, 2015 10:30 AM ESTGarry Kasparov was not afraid of a computer. When the world chess champion agreed to play a match against Deep Blue, the IBM supercomputer designed to beat him, he was so confident that, according to TIME, he scoffed at an offer to split the $500,000 purse 60-40 between winner and loser. He preferred all or nothing.While Kasparov won the match on this day, Feb. 17, in 1996, victory didnrsquo;t come as easily as he had predicted. In fact, Deep Blue won the first game they played. It was a shattering experience for Kasparov, as his coach told TIME. And he wasnrsquo;t th stanley tumbler e only one reeling. Luddites everywhere were on notice: here was a machine better than humankindrsquo best at a game that depended as much on gut instinct as sheer calculation. Surely the Cylons were on their way.But after rallying to beat Deep Blue, winning three matches and drawing two after his initial loss, Kasparov wasnrsquo;t ready to give up on the human race mdash; or hi stanley cup price mself. He later explained, in an essay for TIME, that Deep Blue flummoxed him in that first game by making a move with no immediate material advantage; nudging a pawn into a posit stanley tumbler ion where it could be easily captured.It was a wonderful and extremely human move, Kasparov noted, and this apparent h